City-Scale, City-Relevant Climate Hazard Indicators Under 1.5°C, 2.0°C, and 3.0°C of Global Warming
This paper describes a data set of 14 temperature- and precipitation-related climate hazard indicators, calculated for 996 cities at the 1.5°C, 2.0°C, and 3.0°C global warming scenarios.
Global climate models can provide valuable information to city decision makers for strategic planning, climate adaptation, risk management, and budgeting—but it can be difficult to glean from these models information that is directly suited to city scales and city problems. This paper describes a new data set, which reports indicators based on 14 city-relevant climate hazards, calculated at a spatial resolution of 0.25-degree resolution (approximately 25 miles for many locations), for 996 large cities. The climate hazards were chosen for their importance for planning in public health, energy infrastructure, and the economic health of cities. The hazard indicators are provided for a 1994-2014 historical baseline as well as three levels of global warming: 1.5°C, 2.0°C, and 3.0°C above the baseline.
The data are based on these 10 temperature-based climate hazards:
- Highest annual temperature
- Annual days hotter than local 95th percentile
- Annual days hotter than 40C
- Annual days hotter than 35C
- Annual cooling degree days (CDD21)
- Annual days with wet-bulb temperature > 31C
- Duration of year’s longest heatwave
- Heatwaves per year
- Annual days with optimal temperature for malaria-carrying mosquitos
- Annual days with optimal temperature for arbovirus-carrying mosquitos
and these precipitation-based climate hazards:
- Highest annual one-day precipitation
- Annual days with precipitation exceeding 90th percentile
- Annual drought days
- Annual days with high landslide risk
For each of these indicators, at each global warming level, the data include three estimates of the average magnitude of the hazard, and three estimates of the probability that the magnitude exceeds three extreme-magnitude thresholds.
The indicators are based on probabilistic models of hazard-magnitude frequency, which we parameterize using magnitudes found in models in the NEX-GDDP-CMIP6 family of downscaled climate simulations. The three estimates of each indicator come from the three best models for the particular hazard, for the particular location, where model selection is based on comparison with a historical-observation data set.
The data set and this paper were produced as part of a project, made possible by Bloomberg Philanthropies, to engage city-level leaders in the global climate policy process.
Key Findings:
- Cities on average will see longer heatwaves, with average duration at 3.0°C 28% longer than at 1.5°C
- Cities on average will see more frequent heatwaves, with 25% more heatwaves per year at 3.0°C than at 1.5°C
- Energy demand for cooling will increase for cities
- Annual number of days with high transmission risk for arboviruses will increase for cities in general, while there will be a modest decline in number of days with high malaria-transmission risk
- All results vary geographically and across income groups
Cover image by momentcaptured1/Flickr
Projects
Integrated Climate Action
Visit ProjectAccelerating urban climate action through collaborative and integrated planning and implementation
Part of CitiesUrban Efficiency & Climate
Visit ProjectHelping cities adopt an integrated approach to improve the built environment, clean the air and tackle climate change.
Part of CitiesUrban Development
Visit ProjectCreating livable neighborhoods that build resilience, improve health, and equitably connect people and opportunities.
Part of CitiesData for Cool Cities
Visit ProjectFilling data gaps, enabling insights and scaling infrastructure investment to reduce extreme heat in cities.
Part of Cities