If passed, the American Power Act (APA) would require companies to hold permits to emit GHGs for all emissions from
facilities emitting more than 25,000 tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) or equivalent greenhouse gas. Most
large U.S. chemical facilities would meet this threshold. By limiting the supply of these permits—
known as emissions allowances—in the market, the government would be able to cap economy-wide
emissions. The APA also includes provisions that would rebate free emissions allowances to facilities
in select subsectors. Eligibility for these free allowance rebates is at the subsector level, and depends
on a subsector’s energy intensity and trade exposure.
WRI has calculated that the APA provides enough free allowances to energy intensive, trade
exposed manufacturing industries that any eligible subsector—as a whole—will receive enough free
permits to cover all emissions in that subsector for 2016 and several years beyond (see WRI’s accompanying
technical document). However, the risk remains that the supply of free permits relative to
demand may decline over time and at a faster rate than originally envisaged.
Predicting how the APA would affect the economy is challenging. For their analysis, Standard &
Poor’s and WRI have each relied on the U.S. Government’s Energy Information Administration’s
(EIA) projections of APA’s impact on GDP, energy prices, and GHG emissions permit prices. As
with any forecasting, these projections indicate what could happen, rather than what would happen.
Standard & Poor’s and WRI based their respective analyses on EIA projections using three GHG
permit price scenarios—low, medium, and high—under the APA. Based on these projections, most
of the chemicals subsectors we examined would only see modest energy and compliance effects in
the first year of assumed compliance (2016).