Most of the discussion about the Paris Agreement focuses on countries' new climate plans, which are aimed at the post-2020 period. But the decisions made in Paris can also ramp up action in the short term, too.
The landmark Paris Agreement on climate change came under tough scrutiny from members of the U.S. House Committee on Science, Space and Technology, but Dr. Andrew Steer said a clean energy economy would "create hundreds of thousands of more jobs, increase GDP and save families money on energy bills."
Lesen Sie diesen Blog HIER auf Englisch
Das Pariser Abkommen ist eine umfassende, rechtlich bindende Vereinbarung, um die Herausforderungen des Klimawandels im Rahmen des Völkerrechts zu bewältigen. Es steht damit in einer Reihe vergleichbarer Vereinbarungen, die politischem Willen auf höchster Ebene Ausdruck verleihen. Es stimmt, dass das Abkommen verbindliche und unverbindliche Elemente beinhaltet; insgesamt ist es jedoch auf Beständigkeit angelegt:...
The new international climate agreement comes into effect only after 55 countries representing at least 55 percent of global emissions sign onto it.
After more than 10 years of negotiations, REDD+, a program to reduce deforestation and forest degradation, is finally permanently enshrined in an international climate agreement.
For the first time, loss and damage now resides within the international climate agreement as a standalone concept. It springs from the reality that there are some climate change impacts that cannot be adapted to—impacts that are so severe that they leave in their wake permanent or significantly damaging effects.
The new Paris Agreement places unprecedented importance on actions needed to help people adapt to a warmer world, and solidifies expectations that all countries will do their part to promote greater climate resilience.
Negotiators made major and encouraging promises when they adopted the new Paris Agreement at COP21 last week. Yet the future success of this Agreement relies on tough questions about accountability, participation, transparency and effectiveness—all of which have governance challenges at their core.
Countries are at different stages of development, with different levels of capabilities. This reality must be considered when building a low-carbon and climate-resilient world.
How to Strengthen the Institutional Architecture for Capacity Building to Support the Post-2020 Climate Regime
This paper focuses on how to improve the institutional architecture under the UNFCCC aimed at or involved in building the capacity of developing countries to address climate change.