Making High Gas Prices Less Painful

Photo from whatatravisty/Flickr

Learn more about three long-term, sustainable policy solutions that would help ease the pain of high gas prices.

With gas prices hovering around $4 a gallon, many Americans are feeling uneasy about the future. And for good reason. Higher prices at the pump channel money away from things that improve our quality of life, like health care, education, and leisure activities.

So far, the response from politicians on Capitol Hill has been anything but inspiring. Many politicians have disingenuously claimed that we don’t need to change our behavior and can “drill our way out of this problem.” Or that we can apply enough pressure on oil-rich countries, who will then turn against their own self-interests and ramp up production. Or that high fuel standards and alternative fuels like ethanol, which just suffered a huge setback with the Iowa floods, will make all our problems go away.

But there is a segment in Washington that gets it. Rep. Earl Blumenauer recently spoke out because he couldn’t find a parking spot in the garage of the Rayburn House of Representatives office building. So many Hill staffers now cycle to work that Mr. Blumenauer, for the first time ever, couldn’t find a space on the bike rack to lock his road bike.

Cycling to work is the type of small behavioral change that can shelter Americans from high fuel prices. But in addition to personal changes, we need a prescription of policies that have a large-scale, structural impacts that make American’s less vulnerable to the whims of OPEC and the global oil market.

The following three ideas, if implemented, will have the added value of reducing carbon dioxide emissions, improving public health, curtailing over-consumption, and providing a structural change that can be sustained over the long term.

  1. Build high-density, mixed-use cities: The vast majority of American cities are built for cars, which creates a sprawling, low-density landscape where people spend too much time and money driving to conduct their daily activities. Cities built around people and walking as opposed to cars and driving have single-family housing, apartments, grocery stores, office space and shops all within walking distance, eliminating the daily need to get behind the wheel. The rise of “New Urbanism” in places like Kentlands, Maryland, and the revitalization of American inner cities in places like Chicago, New York, and Washington DC suggests that more and more Americans want a lifestyle that favors short walking trips over long car commutes.

  2. Invest in Mass Transit: Americans are flocking to mass transit in ever greater numbers. At 10.3 billion trips last year, mass-transit ridership in the United States is at its highest level since 1957. To match this growing demand, cities should invest money to maintain and expand their mass-transit systems. One practical way to do this is to charge car drivers for using the most congested roads and use this revenue to fund mass-transit projects and operations. London, Singapore, and Stockholm all have wildly successful congestion-pricing programs that are, counter to conventional wisdom, popular among residents. Mass transit does not necessarily mean rail. Cities can also thrive with low-cost, fast implementation systems like bus rapid transit, which has been done in Los Angeles, Ottawa, Sidney, Mexico City, Curitiba, and Bogotá.

  3. Invest in Cycling Facilities: Increasingly, cycling is becoming popular among commuters making short trips around cities. But the spike in the number of city cyclists has yet to be followed by a supply of cycling facilities like bike lanes and bike parking. In many cities, cyclists have to compete with cars for road space, a dangerous proposition that drives potential cyclists off their bikes and back into cars. By building special cycle lanes that are physically separated from traffic, cities can make cycling a viable, low-cost form of transit. Cycling can also be instrumental in countering chronic diseases like diabetes and obesity, which are now afflicting large swaths of the sedentary American population. Paris, among other cities, has taken cycling a step above the rest, creating a bike-sharing program with 15,000 bicycles available at a moments notice for anyone with a credit card. Cyclists and politicians in American cities should take note.
  • Dario Hidalgo, Director for Research and Practice

    Dr. Hidalgo guides the EMBARQ Network’s international team of transport engineers, urban planning specialists and environmental scientists.

6 Comments

Comments expressed on this page are opinions of the authors themselves, and not positions of the World Resources Institute. WRI reserves the right to remove any comments that it considers inappropriate or spam.

I think people should ride

I think people should ride their bikes or walk so america loses some weight and no one has to weairy about gas. People would benifit from this because theywould not care who has the best car or the better gas mileage. It' s not like america couldn't aford to lose some weight like I said before.

I just noticed that WRI is

I just noticed that WRI is having an event related to this subject on July 21: "Too Expensive to Ignore: The Real Story on Car Fuel Economy and Use":

http://www.wri.org/event/2008/07/too-expensive-ignore-the-re...

Exactly. High density,

Exactly. High density, mixed-use, walkable communities with multiple transportation options, including transit, bicycle, car sharing and walking infrastructure are not only becoming more desirable as energy costs rise, but these neighborhoods are more affordable for households, too. The 'drive to you qualify' approach to land use, transportation and housing policy is based on the false assumption that households will save money by living further from urban areas where housing is often less expensive. Transportation costs are not typically factored into the decision-making process by either individuals, mortgage lenders or municipal planners. However, a new interactive mapping website, the Housing and Transportation Affordability Index, http://htaindex.cnt.org/map_tool was recently released to quantify households' combined housing and transportation cost using neighborhood-level data for 52 US metropolitan areas. They've recently added updated 2008 gasoline expenditure data.

The Housing and Transportation Affordability Index was developed by the Center for Neighborhood Technology http://www.cnt.org (CNT) and its collaborative partners, the Center for Transit Oriented Development (CTOD) for the Brookings Institution's Urban Markets Initiative.

The Wall Street Journal has

The Wall Street Journal has this nice post on a city effort in Dallas to make people walk more:

http://blogs.wsj.com/environmentalcapital/2008/06/05/pump-pa...

Terrific insights and

Terrific insights and encouraging thoughts. However, many of the "new cities" most notably in the Southern regions that include Atlanta, Houston, San Antonio, Phoenix, Dallas, Jacksonville, where a lot of population is occuring have some of the weakest transportation systems in the country. For example, in Houston, the 4th largest city in the US, mass transit has conflicted mightily with the desires of deep pocket developers, who always win in the battle to advance mass transportation. Another factor is that many of these cities are designed for "separation" and not integration, which rests heavily with race (because people want to move further out and away) and the location of affordable housing. This exacerbates the dependence on automobiles.

The irony is that change and business opportunities happen so fast, a multi-discplinary team of urban planners, citizens, large employers, school officials and the like don't have a forum to have "real" conversations that drive how people will live in 30-40 years out. Now, we are in fact "experiencing" this mistake and thus need to start thinking NOW about what 30-40 years out will look and design places that facilitate economy of resources and thus reduce our dependence on oil.

Your point is spot on about

Your point is spot on about new cities. Especially in a place like Houston where oil is king - luxury car sales are skyrocketing in Houston even with gas prices so high.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-windfall-...

But in other new cities like Denver, people who live on the fringes are starting to suffer:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/25/business/25exurbs.html

My prediction is that more and more people will begin moving back to the urban core. It might take a long time, but all the incentives are there.