WRI Publications Feed: Renewable Energy & Efficiency

Communicating the "Financeability" of Energy Efficiency Projects (EEPs): Guide to Data Needs for Financing EEPs in China

Sarah Parsons — Tue, 08 Jan 2013 12:12:48 -0500

Executive Summary

The purpose of this guide (Guide) is to help industrial companies (Hosts) finance energy efficiency projects (EEPs) at their facilities as defined in Annex C of this document. The Guide is designed to help Hosts know what information is required of them by financing entities (Financiers) to streamline the evaluation and financing process. This Guide can also help financial institutions, energy services companies (ESCOs), vendors, and other project developers better understand the information required to finance EEPs. The Guide draws from the authors’ experiences and insights gained through extensive work with Hosts, Financiers, ESCOs, prestigious universities such as Shanghai Jiaotong University (SJTU), and other stakeholders in the financing of EEPs. It was developed in partnership with Chinese and global Financiers and energy efficiency experts.

Findings indicate that Hosts can accelerate and enhance the financing process and likelihood of success in three ways:

Communicating with Financiers as early as possible to understand their informational or structural needs, their financing decision-making criteria and processes, as well as any special services that the Financiers provide (i.e., technical assistance in designing EEPs).
Performing a “self-screening” assessment of any proposed EEPs that many Financiers would evaluate, such as type of Host or technology, size of project, and so on.
Providing as much detailed and accurate information as possible at the beginning of the financing process since plentiful data will increase credibility with Financiers.

Hosts often experience delays and rejection of EEP financing because Financiers were not provided critical Host and project data in a timely and accurate manner. This has prevented Financiers from receiving a compelling picture of the benefits and (limited) risks of a promising EEP. Being prepared to present the correct data to Financiers results in a smoother financing process and a much higher probability of success.

This Guide is designed to:

familiarize Hosts with the type of data most Financiers use to evaluate EEPs, as set forth in Annex A: EEP Assessment Indicators, and explain why the data are important;
explain the general indicators used by Financiers to evaluate Host and project attractiveness and why these indicators are used;
explain what information is important during the different stages of the financing process;
help a Host conduct its own assessment of its EEP prior to submitting an application to prospective Financiers, to help improve the quality of the financing application and likelihood of success;
highlight common mistakes Hosts make when seeking energy efficiency financing, and illustrate the impact different financing mechanisms have on a Financier’s evaluation and requirements of the Host and the EEP.

By using this Guide to become more familiar with the financing process for EEPs, Hosts can improve their success rate in securing attractive external financing to increase their facilities’ energy efficiency.

Two Degrees of Innovation: How to Seize the Opportunities in Low-Carbon Power

Maggie Barron — Fri, 09 Sep 2011 10:38:40 -0400

This paper offers a strategic framework for those seeking to capitalize on the low-carbon transition. The first section presents innovation as a key strategy to achieve economic development, energy, and environmental goals. The second section explains why the innovation process is unique in the low-carbon power sector and introduces the innovation ecosystem. The third section lays out a stepby- step process to identify and capitalize on the enormous potential and emerging opportunities in this sector.

Key Points

A global transformation of the energy infrastructure is urgently needed to meet the need for modern energy services while avoiding a climate disaster.
There is a large and growing global market for utility-scale, low carbon power technologies as this transformation begins. Both developed and emerging economies can benefit from it but competing in the global value chain will require explicitly building innovation capacity.
Innovation—improvements in price and performance—will close the gap between low-carbon technologies today and the low-cost, high performance technologies that are needed.
Innovations include new products, processes, or policies that reduce costs or improve performance and can happen at any point in a technology’s lifecycle—from design through manufacturing through operations and maintenance.
The innovation ecosystem approach captures the complexity, uncertainty, and heterogeneity of innovation processes and identifies the critical services innovators need to thrive. These are the services policymakers need to focus on when investing in innovation.
The framework provides step-by-step guidance to identify the opportunities in the sector and build a robust innovation ecosystem to capture them.

Is the Fit Right? Considering Technological Maturity in Designing Renewable Energy Policy

Kevin Lustig — Thu, 11 Aug 2011 14:20:52 -0400

Recent studies suggest that the United States can greatly expand its deployment of renewable energy resources beyond current levels. This would reduce emissions of harmful pollutants and enhance energy security by diversifying the nation’s domestic energy supply. This brief describes a number of policy tools that can be employed to drive investment in renewable energy technologies and discusses which policy options may be the best fit based on the commercial maturity of a targeted technology. We examine several policy tools to describe where they have been most effective to advance technology progress along the innovation chain. The findings and recommendations presented are based on a study of the literature on technology innovation and policy best practices, as well as on discussions with experts in the field, policymakers, and private sector companies involved in renewable energy projects.

Key findings:

Grants can be used to fund technologies in their earliest stages—research and development (R&D) and early-stage demonstration. The R&D stage involves significant uncertainty as to whether the concept will ever lead to a viable technology application. Grants help overcome this risk because they provide an important cost share for investment to research and develop the technology further. Technologies in the demonstration stage typically have difficulty accessing commercial investment due to uncertainty on technical performance and the inability to provide performance warranties. It is unclear whether they will eventually be financially profitable, particularly in the near-term. Demonstration grants allow commercial investors time to pilot and evaluate a new technology with appropriate due diligence. This can reduce risk perception and facilitate further investment.
Loan guarantee programs are well suited for technologies in the commercialization and early deployment stages. In these stages, project performance remains uncertain, making it difficult to attract investors. Loan guarantees help attract private investors by sharing the risk of technical failure with a financially secure and credible entity (namely, a government agency).
Tax credits and feed-in tariffs (FITs) can help advance technologies in the later stages of innovation, namely commercialization and early deployment. These policies allow projects to earn more profit for electricity produced so that they earn the revenues needed to offset higher upfront investment costs.
Renewable electricity standards (RES) are most effective for more mature technologies that are in early deployment. An RES creates demand for renewable electricity and allows the market to determine how to most efficiently supply it; thus the market sets the premium paid to renewable resources. RES mandates can allow for open competition among a range of different technologies, or can be tailored with a carve-out to promote specific technologies that are not yet cost competitive with other renewables. The carve-out option can be a good fit for technologies that are still in the commercialization phase.
A favorable regulatory environment is important to ensure that renewable energy technologies do not face inherent disadvantages due to interconnection standards, utility pricing structures, and other legal hurdles. Failing to address regulatory barriers to renewables can increase their cost of deployment and reduce the effectiveness of incentive programs.

Grounding Green Power: Bottom-Up Perspectives on Smart Renewable Energy Policy in Developing Countries

Maggie Barron — Tue, 24 May 2011 12:51:13 -0400

Watch the summary interview with Lead Author Lutz Weischer

This paper was published by the German Marshall Fund of the United States in cooperation with the Heinrich Boell Foundation and the World Resources Institute.

Developing Countries in the Renewable Energy Transformation

In order to meet the intensifying climate challenge, the global energy system must undergo a fundamental transformation, with a rapid increase of renewable energy worldwide. Developing countries are at the forefront of this challenge, since they are expected to add around 80 percent of all new electric generation capacity worldwide in the next two decades.

The deployment of energy from renewable sources is accelerating in developing countries, and already accounts for a higher percentage of electricity generation than in the developed world. In 2008, non-OECD nations generated 21 percent of their electricity from renewable sources including large-scale hydroelectric power (compared with 17 percent in OECD countries), according to International Energy Agency (IEA) statistics. However, this figure must more than double by 2035, to 46 percent, in order to meet the IEA’s “450 scenario,” which outlines a climate friendly pathway for meeting global energy demands.

Transforming the energy system on this scale will require significantly increased support from developed countries, channeled through both bilateral assistance and multilateral institutions, as well as philanthropic initiatives. Our conclusions, derived from a series of case studies and a comprehensive review of existing literature, suggest that donors should deploy financial support more effectively by moving beyond a project-by-project approach to one that creates the right environment for investments in scaled-up, nationwide deployment.

This working paper seeks to assist in this process, by identifying key components of smart renewable energy policy in developing countries, focusing on the power sector. It also provides recommendations for maximizing the effectiveness of international support for deployment of renewable energies, drawn from these on-the-ground experiences in developing countries.

About this Working Paper

Chapter 1 introduces the approach and methodology taken in this paper and describes the key concepts we address. The second chapter discusses what developing countries are already doing to deploy renewable energy sources, and how they can be supported in scaling up such efforts. It also introduces a set of principles of smart renewable energy policy to propel such a transformation, developed by the World Resources Institute. These are based on insights drawn from case studies of existing renewable energy policies in 12 countries in Africa, Asia, and Latin America as well as from existing literature.

The following five chapters each examine one key element of smart renewable energy policy, discuss lessons learned, and identify needs for international support. These cover planning and strategy (Chapter 3), well-designed generation-based incentives (Chapter 4), an enabling policy and regulatory framework (Chapter 5), attractive financing conditions (Chapter 6), and the necessary technical environment (Chapter 7). Our findings and recommendations are summarized in Chapter 8.

Principles of Smart Renewable Energy Policy

We define smart renewable energy policy as the set of rules, regulations, and government actions that lead to an increased share of renewables in total electricity consumption in line with a country’s development objectives. Smart renewable energy policy encourages private investment, achieves its objectives in a cost-effective way, promotes continuous innovation, and is designed through transparent, accountable, and participatory processes.

Presentation

Download Slides (PDF, 839 Kb)

Purchasing Power: Best Practices Guide to Collaborative Solar Procurement

Maggie Barron — Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:30:59 -0400

Executive Summary

Background

Solar photovoltaics (PV) is a commercially proven technology and, in markets with incentives, can compete with traditional fossil fuel-based power. Wider adoption and decreases in manufacturing costs are driving down the cost of solar electricity. As the industry grows and matures, it will optimize and standardize its practices to further reduce costs and make solar energy accessible to a mainstream market. The crucial role of policy in accelerating this industry growth and maturation cannot be understated. Today, however, several barriers remain to bringing solar PV to scale:

Transaction costs can be high. Because the industry is fragmented and installation processes are not standardized around the country, each developer has different procedures and negotiated contracts. Allocating internal staff resources to research solar power and to negotiate fair contracts for each potential site can be expensive.
Learning takes time and effort. Potential buyers have to learn on their own about the solar market, financing, and technology, while building internal consensus for moving forward.
Demand is fragmented with many individual sites being developed opportunistically. The current patchwork approach of designing, permitting, contracting, and installing systems for one facility at a time is inefficient.

These barriers help explain the slow pace of solar PV adoption among commercial and government consumers. However, collaborative purchasing can help overcome these barriers and scale up solar PV deployment. By organizing interested consumers (and their potential installation sites) into groups, collaborative purchasing can reduce transaction costs, educate potential buyers, and aggregate demand so that solar panels can be installed at lower-than-average costs.

Purpose

This Best Practices Guide is intended to assist commercial and government entities in the process of organizing and executing a collaborative solar purchase. A measure of success will be the number of readers who use this guide in purchasing solar power to meet their electricity needs more sustainably and at an affordable price. The guide outlines a list of best practices, which together constitute a 12-step process to capture the economic and practical benefits of a joint purchase. The starting point for participating in such an effort is simply an interest in purchasing solar electricity. The best practices are intended as a resource for project planning and decision making. They provide specific actions in chronological order, with milestones to indicate when to move from one step to the next. The end goal is that regional groups of participants will have solar PV installed on their facilities at competitive prices.

Experts in the solar energy field, including those specializing in regional collaboration, helped to develop the best practices presented here. They are based on extensive research and real-world experiences, and are supported by case studies (one a private sector collaborative and one with public-sector participants). These two cases were unique models of regional collaboration, among the first in the country at this scale. Like all new approaches to a problem, both efforts encountered challenges along the way. Throughout the guide, we illustrate the lessons learned from these challenges, point out pitfalls to avoid, and highlight ways to streamline the process. We also provide resources, such as solicitation and procurement documents, participant questionnaires, and evaluation criteria.

By promoting the use of this guide and sample documents, we hope to encourage the use of these models for regional collaborative efforts. Successful collaboration can lead to lower costs, increased competition and vendor performance, and better projects with higher visibility.

Twelve Steps for Collaborative Solar Purchasing

1 Early regional recruiting

RESULTS: Initial participants indicate interest and agree to proceed with site identification and assessment in next stage.

2 Initial participant questionnaire

RESULTS: List of potential participating organizations with site opportunities and considerations documented.

3 Solar project workshop

RESULTS: All participants share common understanding about the basics of collaborative purchasing, key metrics to evaluate, timeline, and expectations of them. Lead organization has been identified.

4 Consolidated analysis of sites

RESULTS: Compelling technical overview of total purchase size and individual bundles. This initiative overview is consolidated into packet including talking points explaining expected benefits for participants and lead organization.

5 Internal decision maker consultation

RESULTS: Buy-in to proceed in procurement process to drafting RFP is obtained from decision makers in each participant/lead organization.

6 Design of procurement process & documents

RESULTS: All participants agree to procurement process, template contracts, and standard terms with understanding of risks and opportunities.

7 Request for proposals

RESULTS: RFP issued with compelling bids received from potential vendors.

8 Proposal evaluation

RESULTS: Winning bidder is selected for each bundle through competitive process that ensures best-value vendor selection.

9 Negotiations and award

RESULTS: Negotiations are complete with successful award and signed contracts with a qualified vendor for each bundle, within agreed timeline.

10 Installation project management

RESULTS: Solar PV systems are properly built to meet or exceed specifications and safety standards.

11 Commissioning and operations

RESULTS: Successful solar installations demonstrate energy production and savings as planned for 25 years or more.

12 Celebration of success

RESULTS: Participants’ internal and external stakeholders, regional community, and government are aware of the positive impact of this effort and support future projects.

Bottom Line on Emerging Solar Metering Policies

admin — Thu, 27 Jan 2011 13:25:16 -0500

Inflexible metering procedures limit the types of customers who can invest in solar electric power, and the scale of systems. New policies for virtual net metering, community solar, and meter aggregation can make solar more economical and accessible.

Virtual Net Metering

What is virtual net metering (VNM)?

Net metering allows utility customers with on-site renewable electricity generating systems to receive credits for excess electricity that is sent to the grid and to later use those credits to offset their electricity bill, or receive outright payment for them.1 In contrast, virtual net metering (VNM) allows multiple customers (with their own discrete meters) to share the net metered credits from a system without rewiring to physically link their meters to the system. Specific rules vary by state, and even by utility. Virtual net metering policies are currently most often available to owners and/or operators of multi-tenant buildings, or to a group of buildings within a small contiguous geographic boundary. Typically, the system must located “behind” (on customer side of) the meter of at least one of the utility customers credited and/or the customers credited must be located within the same facility where the system is installed.

For example, a low-income housing building owner could install a solar PV system where the power flows through a single meter and feeds directly back into the grid. The utility would allocate the credits for the kilowatt-hours received to each tenant’s individual utility account based on a pre-agreed percentage sharing scheme. While VNM customers sharing an electricity generation source do need to be in the same utility territory, they do not need to be under the same rate schedule in most states.

Which states allow for virtual net metering?

California
Colorado
Delaware
Maine
Massachusetts
Rhode Island
Vermont

How does virtual net metering facilitate new customer participation?

Currently, virtual net metering is most often available for occupants of multi-tenant buildings, low-income housing, municipal buildings, and to groups of buildings in contiguous proximity to the solar installation. Without VNM, separate tenants with a solar investment on their building’s roof would each have to be physically connected to the system to receive net metered credits on their separate utility bills. This is cost-prohibitive and logistically difficult.

What is “community solar”?

Community solar programs and policies facilitate joint ownership or sponsorship of a generating system, and sharing of the benefits even when the power itself cannot be physically shared. It can make solar accessible to owners of property that cannot accommodate a solar PV array and those prohibited from entering into legal ownership structures typically used for solar, among others.

Policies and incentives vary from state to state, thus there is no one standard community solar model. According to a publication of the National Renewable Energy Lab, three project models are currently the most common:

Utility-Sponsored Model: a utility owns or operates a project that is open to voluntary ratepayer participation;
- United Power, an electric co-op in Colorado, offers the option to lease panels at its Sol Partners Cooperative Solar Farm for a fixed upfront fee. In return, payment for the kilowatt-hour (kWh) production is credited to their account at a “community solar” rate higher than the retail rate.
Special Purpose Entity (SPE) Model: individual investors join in a business enterprise to develop a community solar project;
- In Maryland, a group of investors formed the University Park Community Solar LLC to invest jointly in a system located on the roof of a local church. Owners share the revenues from power sales to the church, as well as from incentives.
Non-Profit “Buy a Brick” Model: donors contribute to a community installation owned by a charitable non-profit corporation. [Donations may be tax deductible, but there are no financial benefits shared, and in fact this does not require special policy.]
- The East Portland Community Center project was funded by local businesses through the “Solar 4R Schools” program. The non-profit program installs solar systems and uses them to educate communities about solar power.

Community solar models often aim to reduce the high upfront costs of solar, sometimes allowing participants buy into the program’s installation(s) monthly or per kWh. Their contribution then entitles them to receive payments for the system’s production, and can fix the price for a portion of their bill to protect against future price increases.

Where is community solar allowed?

The following states allow at least one of the community solar models listed above:

Arizona
California
Colorado
Delaware
Florida
Illinois
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Utah
Washington

Meter Aggregation

What is “meter aggregation”

Meter aggregation allows for allocation of the credits from a solar electric system to meters in buildings separate from where the actual power is produced, if they are on the same customer’s utility account. It is usually reserved for buildings located in a tight geographical boundary, either adjacent to one another or located no more than a few miles from one another. It can be done physically, which may require additional equipment, or virtually.

Often, net metering policies limit the amount of power that a customer can sell back to the grid to less than a set percentage of their annual consumption. The benefit of meter aggregation is that several facilities’ metered annual consumption is aggregated; thus the owner can install a larger system and sell more power back. Meter aggregation is often used in agricultural operations or business campuses where there are multiple separate facilities with the same owner.

Summary

In summary, net metering, virtual net metering, community solar, and meter aggregation can be characterized as follows:

Net metering: allocation of benefits to one customer via one meter;
Virtual net metering: allocation of net metered energy credits denoted in kWh to multiple customers with separate meters, often system located on their site or nearby;
Community solar: allocation of benefits across meters of multiple customers who may or may not be near and/or own some part of the generating system, and
Meter aggregation: allocation of system benefits to multiple meters of one customer.

Bottom Line on Renewable Energy Tax Credits

Tim Herzog — Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:39:17 -0400

This is an update to the first Bottom Line on Renewable Energy Tax Credits, published April 2008, which answers basic questions about different types of tax credits, their purpose, and qualification requirements. This document has been updated to reflect legislative changes that have occurred since then and is up-to-date as of September 12, 2010.

Watch the Video Overview

Stock video footage courtesy of Footage of the World

What are the Production Tax Credit (PTC) and the Investment Tax Credit (ITC)?

The Production Tax Credit (PTC) reduces the federal income taxes of qualified tax-paying owners of renewable energy projects based on the electrical output (measured in kilowatt-hours, or kWh) of grid-connected renewable energy facilities. The Investment Tax Credit (ITC) reduces federal income taxes for qualified tax-paying owners based on capital investment in renewable energy projects (measured in dollars). The ITC is earned when the equipment is placed into service.

What is the Treasury cash grant?

The cash grant is an option for ITC-eligible projects to receive the value of the ITC as a direct grant instead of as a tax credit. Eligible technologies can receive a cash grant covering up to 30% of the capital investment. Since the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) allowed PTC-eligible projects to elect the ITC instead, those projects can also elect to receive the cash grant.

What is the Advanced Energy Manufacturing Tax Credit (MTC)?

The Advanced Energy Manufacturing Tax Credit (MTC) awards tax credits to new, expanded, or re-equipped domestic manufacturing facilities that support clean energy development. The Department of Energy (DOE) and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) allocated MTC credits in April 2010 to projects based on their commercial viability, job creation, GHG reductions and other factors. Since more applications were received than anticipated, the Obama administration requested that the MTC be extended.

Who qualifies for the PTC?

Depending on the complexity of the ownership structure, it may be appropriate to get a letter of opinion from the IRS for specific projects. Below is some high-level guidance on claiming the PTC:

A tax-paying entity must own the generating asset and sell the electricity to an unrelated third party.
Entities that do not pay taxes, such as publicly owned electric utilities, rural electric cooperatives and government bodies, may not take advantage of the PTC. Investor-owned utilities do qualify for the PTC.
Generating assets must be located in the United States and placed in service between December 31, 1992 and January 1, 2013 (for wind) or January 1, 2014 (all others).

Who qualifies for the ITC?

The following are basic guidelines for claiming the ITC:

System owner must be a tax-paying entity.
Equipment must be new, though used equipment can potentially be treated as new depending on the amount of upgrades after the purchase.
System must be placed in service between December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2016.
PTC-eligible projects can elect to receive the ITC instead of the PTC.
While the original ITC excluded publicly owned electric utilities, those can now benefit from the ITC as of 2008. Investor owned utilities remain eligible.

What are the other tax incentives granted to renewable energy projects? What are MACRS and Bonus Depreciation?

Modified Accelerated Capital-Recovery System (MACRs) is a system of rules and schedules for accelerated depreciation. A five year depreciation schedule is allowed for all ITC-eligible technologies as well as large wind projects. For some biomass property, the schedule is over 7 years. Bonus Depreciation allowed taxpayers to deduct 50% of the value of eligible systems in the first year but has not been renewed for 2010.

What are the upper limits or maximum value that can be awarded in tax credits?

The ITC does not limit the total credit value granted to a project, but does limit the credit value granted per kW of capacity of certain technologies. For small wind projects placed in service starting in 2009, the ITC dollar cap was removed by the ARRA. The maximum incentive for fuel cells is $3,000 per kW and for microturbines is $200 per kW.

Toward a Sunny Future? Global Integration in the Solar PV Industry

Maggie Barron — Fri, 21 May 2010 09:37:58 -0400

Abstract

Policymakers seem to face a trade-off when designing national trade and investment policies related to clean energy sectors. They have pledged to address climate change and accelerate the large-scale deployment of renewable energy technologies, which would benefit from increased global integration, but they are also tempted to nurture and protect domestic clean technology markets to create green jobs at home and ensure domestic political support for more ambitious climate policies. This paper analyzes the global integration of the solar photovoltaic (PV) sector and looks in detail at the industry’s recent growth patterns, industry cost structure, trade and investment patterns, government support policies and employment generation potential.

In order to further stimulate both further growth of the solar industry and local job creation without constructing new trade and investment barriers, we recommend the following:

Governments must provide sufficient and predictable long-term support to solar energy deployment. Such long-term frameworks bring investments forward and encourage cost cutting and innovation, so that government support can decrease over time. A price on carbon emissions would provide an additional long-term market signal and likely accelerate this process.
Policymakers should focus not on solely the manufacturing jobs in the solar industry, but on the total number of jobs that could possibly be created including those in research, project development, installation, operations and maintenance.
Global integration and broader solar PV technology deployment through lower costs can be encouraged by keeping global solar PV markets open. Protectionist policies risk slowing the development of global solar markets and provoking retaliatory actions in other sectors. Lowering existing trade barriers—by abolishing tariffs, reducing non-tariff barriers and harmonizing industry standards—would create a positive policy environment for further global integration.

About the Authors

Jacob Funk Kirkegaard is a research fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. Thilo Hanemann is research director at the Rhodium Group. Lutz Weischer is a research analyst with the World Resources Institute’s Climate and Energy Program. Matt Miller is a consultant in the solar industry with manufacturing and development experience.

What's Blocking the Sun? Solar Photovoltaics for the U.S. Commercial Market

Maggie Barron — Wed, 05 May 2010 09:41:28 -0400

Executive Summary

The commercial sector of the U.S. economy is in a unique position to drive growth in the solar photovoltaic (PV) market, widening it geographically as well as increasing its total size. The retailers, multinational companies, and small businesses that occupy commercial real estate in the United States make up 36 percent of national electricity consumption. The roof print of these businesses is vast and suitable for installing solar PV at scale. These potential investors are increasing their attention to the risks of climate change and seeking investment solutions that can meet their growing power demands as well as their sustainability mandates. However, more than 90 percent of commercial PV capacity installed is concentrated in only five states. Beyond pioneers in a few key states, why have more businesses not found solar PV to be the solution? Over the past year, our team interviewed members of WRI’s Climate and Business Projects in order to understand the experiences of businesses exploring or participating in solar PV markets; those interviews inform this working paper.

This paper provides a snapshot of the current investment environment for solar PV in the United States from the commercial end user’s point of view. The current installation trends, policy landscape, and economics are described in detail. Solar PV installations are concentrated in states with strong financial incentives and no regulatory barriers to distributed generation. Commercial investments have fared worse than the residential market during the economic downturn of the past two years. The policy landscape has improved since 2008, but multiple regulatory barriers remain at the state level and federal support is less certain after 2010.

An analysis of the hurdles remaining for solar PV finds that they are both economic and regulatory. The economics of a PV system is modeled in detail for four U.S. states, showing the potential impact of lower module costs as well as state and federal policies on the levelized cost of solar power. PV has not yet reached cost parity with traditional power generation without a price on carbon, but its costs are expected to continue to decline and to eventually reach grid parity. The evolution of new business models and support policies is needed to stimulate deployment and accelerate this transition. Solutions are discussed that have the potential to “unblock” investment in this sector, including regulatory reform, demand aggregation, new financing mechanisms and public R&D investment.

With the objective of expanding the commercial market for solar PV, we make 18 strategic recommendations for solar industry members, commercial energy end users, and policy makers. Recognizing that the PV industry is in a highly dynamic phase and that these are only a few of the solutions that could put it on a sustainable path to grid parity, we conclude with questions for further research. At the end of this paper, there is a survey containing three sets of key questions, each targeted to different stakeholders.

It Should Be A Breeze: Harnessing the Potential of Open Trade and Investment Flows in the Wind Energy Industry

Maggie Barron — Tue, 08 Dec 2009 12:27:14 -0500

The political debate concerning climate change and global trade and investment flows has increasingly taken on a defensive posture in the United States and other developed countries. The spotlight has been on the competitiveness of energy-intensive industries and potential border adjustment mechanisms to prevent carbon leakage, as well as on the need to grow and protect industries that will gain from a low-carbon future and create millions of new “green jobs” at home.

This paper analyzes the global wind power industry in light of the latter debate and shows that global integration—broadly defined as increasing cross-border trade and investment flows —can make a strong positive contribution in the form of green technology cost reductions and innovation while still creating predominantly local jobs. As such, national trade and investment policies that promote increased global integration of the wind industry are a powerful ally in the fight against climate change.

Our analysis starts with a brief summary of current and future global demand for wind turbines and the role of government support in this demand picture. Next, we show how the wind energy sector is developing into a truly global industry characterized by high levels of growth and competition and how this process is increasingly driven by cross-border investment rather than trade. Then we map out the globalization potential of different components in the value chain and analyze existing barriers to further global integration. Finally, we discuss the distributional consequences of greater globalization and especially the outlook for green job creation along the wind value chain, before we conclude with a set of policy recommendations.

Our principal findings are:

Local demand creation draws in local production. Demand for wind energy through long-term government support policies creates the basis for local supply of wind capital equipment and services and associated local job creation; policies that put a price on carbon will further help to make wind more competitive and increase the overall demand for turbines and equipment.
Cross-border investment rather than trade is the dominant mode of global integration. Standard international trade in wind energy equipment is relatively small and declining. Instead, foreign direct investment (FDI) flows dominate the global integration of the wind sector, and the cost structure of the wind industry favors the emergence of regional production hubs in markets of sufficient size.
Abolishing trade tariffs will have limited effects on the wind industry. Principal barriers to global integration are not at-the-border tariffs but rather several nontariff trade barriers and formal and informal barriers that distort firms’ investment decisions.
Intellectual property rights (IPRs) are currently not restricting firms’ access to wind power equipment markets. Intellectual property plays only a very limited role in the cost structures of the wind industry, and technology is widely available for licensing. IPRs therefore cannot be considered a major impediment for market participation for firms from both developed and developing countries.
A highly globalized wind industry will create jobs locally. Wind energy is a generally more labor-intensive source of electricity supply compared with fossil fuel generation. Due to its specific characteristics, a globalized wind industry will still create lasting and highly localized employment opportunities.