Uganda: Rural Subcounties with Safe Drinking Water Coverage Below 60 Percent, 2008

Uganda: Rural Subcounties with Safe Drinking Water Coverage Below 60 Percent, 2008
Credit:

International boundaries (NIMA, 1997), district administrative boundaries (UBOS, 2006b), subcounty administrative boundaries (UBOS, 2002a), water bodies (NFA, 1996; NIMA, 1997; Brakenridge et al., 2006), and rural safe drinking water coverage (DWD, 2008)

This map highlights the rural subcounties with safe drinking water coverage rates below 60 percent. All of these areas will require special attention and additional investments to catch up with the progress at the national level.

In comparison to high-performing regions, many subcounties with the lowest coverage rates are facing two major challenges – greater dependence on costly deep boreholes and generally very poor groundwater potential (MWE, 2007).

Comments

Comments expressed on this page are opinions of the authors themselves, and not positions of the World Resources Institute. WRI reserves the right to remove any comments that it considers inappropriate or spam.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • No HTML tags allowed
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Filtered words will be replaced with the filtered version of the word.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is to verify that you are indeed an actual person, and not a spam-bot or other nuisance.
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.