Uganda: Poverty Rate in Rural Subcounties That Failed HSSP I Target for Improved Sanitation Facilities

Uganda: Poverty Rate in Rural Subcounties That Failed HSSP I Target for Improved Sanitation Facilities
Credit:

International boundaries (NIMA, 1997), district administrative boundaries (UBOS, 2006b), subcounty administrative boundaries (UBOS, 2002a), water bodies (NFA, 1996; NIMA, 1997; Brakenridge et al., 2006), households with improved sanitation facilities (UBOS, 2002b), and rural poverty rate (UBOS and ILRI, 2008).

This map displays the poverty rate (the percent of the population below the poverty line) for subcounties that had not achieved Uganda’s interim national rural target of 58 percent improved sanitation coverage (HSSP I) in 2002.

The brown areas show higher poverty rates, while the green areas represent low poverty rates. The majority of subcounties behind on the HSSP I target have poverty rates above 40 percent with a large number having rates greater than 60 percent.

Comments

Comments expressed on this page are opinions of the authors themselves, and not positions of the World Resources Institute. WRI reserves the right to remove any comments that it considers inappropriate or spam.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • No HTML tags allowed
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Filtered words will be replaced with the filtered version of the word.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is to verify that you are indeed an actual person, and not a spam-bot or other nuisance.
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.