You are here

The Pope, the Economy and the Case for Climate Action

This week Pope Francis issues his long awaited Encyclical on Climate Change. The Pope’s message should galvanize support for climate action for the Catholic community and well beyond. It will speak not only to the 5,000 Catholic Bishops, nor only to the 1.2 billion Catholics worldwide, but to all people of goodwill who are open to the moral context of climate change.

I’m confident of this, since two weeks ago, together with members of the Global Commission on the Economy and Climate Change, I had the great privilege of meeting with the Pope and his top Cardinals at the Vatican to discuss the subject.

Trampling and Muddying

Concern about human despoiling of God’s creation is not new for the church. Two thousand six hundred years ago, the prophet Ezekiel, speaking for God, asks:

Is it not enough for you to feed on the good pasture? Must you also trample the rest of your pasture with your feet?

Is it not enough for you to drink clear water? Must you also muddy the rest with your feet? (Ezekiel 34: 18)

Ezekiel is making a moral and spiritual point as well as a physical point, of course. Environmental damage is a symptom of a deeper moral problem -- of excess, self-centeredness, thoughtlessness and a disregard for the needs of others. This is precisely what’s causing climate change today. A key insight from passages like this is the pointlessness and unfairness of it all. Nobody benefits from the trampling and muddying, but many get hurt by it.

This brings us back to why we met with the Pope and Vatican leaders. They and we are concerned that too many political and business leaders, and regular citizens, believe that dependence on high-carbon fossil fuels (the “trampling and muddying” of climate change) are necessary for progress: an inevitable price to be paid for economic growth and poverty reduction. Many people understand the need to address climate change, but some believe the cost would be too high in terms of lost growth and progress. This is a wrong understanding.

In last year’s New Climate Economy report, produced by the Global Commission on the Economy and Climate (WRI serves as the managing partner), we showed that addressing climate change with urgency will actually promote more rather than less progress, even in the near term. It will create more efficiency, more fairness and better health, and will cost less over the medium term thanthe current approach.

In our meeting at the Vatican, President Felipe Calderon (former President of Mexico, and Chair of the Commission) explained the compelling new evidence that strong climate action is good for the economy and good for society. Global Commissioners Paul Polman (CEO of Unilever), Naina Lal Kidwai (Chair of HSBC India), and Jeremy Oppenheim (Senior Partner at McKinsey) spoke of how climate change is hurting the poor and the economy, how technology has transformed our options, how a rapidly growing number of business leaders recognize the need for urgent action, including taxing carbon emissions, and how this can help provide clarity to guide their investment decisions. Cardinal Parolin (Secretary of State at the Vatican), Cardinal Turkson (President of the Pontifical Council on Justice and Peace), and Cardinal Donald Wuerl (Archbishop of Washington) spoke of the long history of theological thought on this issue, and the commitment of the church together with businesses, governments and all citizens to engage strongly in addressing this critical issue.


Oddly, some people – including a least one aspiring presidential candidate – have suggested that church leaders should stick to spiritual issues and not opine on issues like climate change. But in reality, anybody who reads the Bible carefully is compelled to speak up on this issue. People of faith have understood this subject for centuries longer than modern day policy wonks and politicians, or even environmentalists. The teaching on creation and environmental issues in the Judeo-Christian scripture is crystal clear: God created nature and saw that it was good. That creation is for the use and enjoyment of humans and other creatures. (But note: use, but not abuse.) The very first commandment to men and women -- in Genesis 2 -- was to be good stewards of God’s good creation.

Why such a strong emphasis on stewardship? In part it’s to ensure that the services of nature are available to the poor and powerless as well as the rich and powerful; and in part because nature itself is good and God chooses to communicate through it. King David writes a beautiful psalm on this point:

The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands.

Day after day they pour forth speech; night after night they reveal knowledge.

They have no speech, they use no words; no sound is heard from them.

Yet their voice goes out into all the earth, their words to the ends of the world.

(Psalm 19)

This is intuitive to anybody who looks at the night sky. And yet today more than 3 billion people never see it due to air pollution. And another 7 million die each year due to that same pollution.

The Bible’s teaching is not anti-development or anti-modernity. Indeed the highest form of human and spiritual organization is often conveyed using urban images. Heaven is referred to as the “City of God.” But the question is what kind of city? What kind of economic development? Would it be a city like many in the world today in which the poor, who are forced to live in the far suburbs, must travel three hours each way to work, in which congestion erodes income? Or in which life expectancies are reduced due to the quality of air, and in which flooding and drought become common occurrences due to the gases we put into the atmosphere? Surely not.

Economic Research Agrees with Pope Francis

The good news is that such city environments are not inevitable on Earth or in heaven. It is possible to design cities around people rather than automobiles, to create more vibrant mixed-use communities, to enjoy lower pollution, more public parks, a much better quality of life and a more dynamic economy. In the process, carbon emissions can be cut by more than half and the cost of infrastructure would be much less than at present. How to do this was laid out in the New Climate Economy report last year, not by a group of ideological environmentalists, but by tough, sharp-penciled business leaders, economists and city planners.

The Commission showed that similar shifts towards low carbon, higher efficiency, people-first trajectories are also possible in rural areas and in energy, where 1.3 billion still lack access to electricity. What’s needed is strong leadership and a change in heart, so that the vested interests in the current model no longer prevent us moving to a much better one.

This is where the Encyclical comes in. His Holiness, Pope Francis, will lay out a compelling moral and spiritual imperative for changed hearts and changed behavior. It should give us great pleasure, and some relief, that economist and business leaders are now catching up with him.


Pope Francis-a man of our times.

As E.F. Schumacher said 50 years ago, Economics as if People Mattered, and Richard Layard wrote in 2007, the human race has forgotten the reason for being on this earth. Maybe the world will listen and take seriously what Papa Francesco has written and make the paradigm shift in thinking, needed to literally save the human race from its own stubborn stupidity

Very well done WRI.

This is really splendid Andrew! And your point about consistency of the Church is well taken. The bishops of several countries including U.S. Bishops have issued modest, moving, persuasive pastorals on the environment. At least three Popes have issued strong statements, though not until now an encyclical. I met with John Paul II on the environment in 1990, and with Pope Francis last week. Patriarch of Constaninople Bartholomew has issued influential New Years environmental proclamations and led environmental cruises on the Black Sea, Baltics, Danube, to publicize the state of contamination and the need for protection and cleanup. The moral dimension is importantly engaged as never before and I compliment your joining your strong voice to remind that the moral course is also the prudent economic one.

Glad that the pope will belatedly give his support to science in declaring climate change to be man-made and glad that he will emphasise the need for good stewardshipof the planet. But one of the biggest causes of the environmental damage to our earth, the loss of wildlife habitat, the inequalities of water and food availability among humans, the problems of waste and pollution and the reckless exploitation of fossil fuels for energy, is.............OVER-POPULATION. The pope has to think a bit more deeply about the consequences of Vatican policies on contraception and abortion before I'm going to join the chorus of hallelujas.

I thought this blog was so brilliantly compelling that I'm going to steal it for a chapel talk I'm giving on environmental issues. Dr Steer and the Pope are both doing a brilliant job.

Have you any idea how progressive Europe views you?, Third world America

thx for sharing. Well, what I find interesting -and laughable (most of time)- is that the very same leaders and organizations who spoiled, and are currently spoiling the thing with the planet are listed here as those, who apply for taking the lead in despoiling the thing with the planet. Can't go.

Add new comment

Stay Connected